The chart shows the number of students in the UK universities who completed (on time or late) failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010.
The given line graph provides information from the research into the number of movies screened on australia and United Kingdom in 2001 while the line graph compares between the trends of cinema admissions in uk and the money paid for cinema admissions in australia over a 30-year period between 1976 and 2006.
Overall, according to the data, US films dominated other counterparts. Meanwhile, the money spent on film admission in uk prevailed upon its rival.
To be specific into the bar chart, nearly 80% of films screened in uk were from America. Similarly, just under 70% movies that Australians watched in the cinema were American productions. In contrast, there was approximate a mere 2% movies screening in australia was made in this country.
Turning to the line graph, after witnessing a trough before 1985, cinema admission in uk sharply rose to its peak at nearly 180 million dollars after 2000 then slightly decreased to about 158 million dollars in the end of the period. The figure for australia fluctuated but followed an upward trend. cinema admission of australia ended up with about 80 million dollars in 2006, which was 4 times as much as its had in 1976.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e line graph compares between the trends of cinema admissions in uk and the money...
^^
Line 27, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cinema
...luctuated but followed an upward trend. cinema admission of australia ended up with ab...
^^^^^^
Line 27, column 408, Rule ID: IT_IS[20]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it has') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it has
...s in 2006, which was 4 times as much as its had in 1976.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15656565657 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60491028563 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.9177045852 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0600234184835 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239242121238 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239663031919 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0355201897472 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00514713719944 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.