The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer’s total sales in North America, South America, Europe and Asia.
The graph reveals the percentage of car sold in four regions by car producers from 2006 and 2010
Overall, the majority of car was purchased in Asia and Europe while the opposite was true in North American. Additionally, car sales in Asia and South America also experienced a significant change while the figures for the remaining regions remained relatively stable throughout the period
In 2006, 30% of the gross revenue was from Asia and Europe each. However, by 2010, the proportion of cars sold reached a peak at 50%, the highest of all, while car turn-over in Europe slightly rose to 35% before dropping back to 30% in 2010
In South America, the figure showed a declining trend over the recorded period, plummeting from its peak at 29% in 2006 to only 9% in the last year. Similarly, car manufacturers witnessed a steady decrease in the percentage of car purchased in North America from 11% to 6% between 2006 and 2009. However, there was a recovery to about 11% in 2010
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-28 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | Louisa_Nguyễn | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | Little_key | view |
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack support because of their parents absence Discuss both th 67
- For many people the reason they work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78362573099 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62666207329 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549707602339 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.621365083 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.6 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334364292283 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172810368721 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968008243851 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190031148886 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733887057859 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.