The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of Australian men and women who were overweight between the years 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of overweight males was higher than the percentage of overweight females, while the figures for both genders rose over the period.
In 1980,40% of men in Australia were overweight and this figure increased to 48% in 1990. Although the proportion then reached a peak in 2000 of 65%, it then fell slightly to just over 60% in 2010.
In contrast, the proportion of overweight Australian women was lower than the figures for males who were overweight. However, there was a steep rise in the percentage of overweight females from just over 30% at the beginning of the period to 45% in 1990. There was a further significant increase to 53%, just over half of all women, in 2000. This figure remained the same in 2010.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82236842105 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65690934052 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7234172566 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3644453038 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150362092603 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976371740477 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221231605099 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541822672314 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.