The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates, the percentage of seats filled in Wright brothers airways, in different categories such as ( economy, premium economy, business and first) in periods of ( 2005, 2010 and 2015).
In summary, in premium economy is the most preferred class, the economy and first class is second most famous class. The business class seats choosing dropped significantly in provided year.
In 2005, the business class was the most popular fare class around (90%) of seats selected. The premium class was constantly increased (95%) in 2010 and 2015 respectively. Moreover, the first and economy classes shared the same figures around (80%) in 2005 and 2010.
In contrast, the business was the least preferable option in 2010, the premium economy skyrocketed wit (95%); whereas, the first and economy classes shared the same figures (80%). The premium economy class was at peak and shared the same numbers as in 2010, followed by the economy and first with value (90%) and (85%) in 2015 respectively. Finally business class was preferred by almost three-quarters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...art illustrates, the percentage of seats filled in Wright brothers airways, in di...
^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...airways, in different categories such as economy, premium economy, business and f...
^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conomy, business and first in periods of 2005, 2010 and 2015. In summary, in pr...
^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...value 90% and 85% in 2015 respectively. Finally business class was preferred by almost ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, second, whereas, in contrast, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64799983274 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8166900703 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0670042231923 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398534779461 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027118455014 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0488512235785 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200298409607 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.