The bar chart shows the percentages of people, who ate five different parts fruit and vegetables as per day between 2001 to 2008 in United kingdom.
The provided bar chart illustrates an overview of the percentage of ( men, women and children), who were eating the different five segment of fruit and vegetables each day in the UK between 2001 and 2008.
In summary, the percentage of men, women and children were increased significantly. The highest percentages of fruit and vegetables were taken by women while the lowest percentages of goods were achieved by children during the 8 years.
In 2001, the highest percentage of women took a food and it was almost 22 percent were as men and children took nearly 17% and about 13% respectively. Similarly, in 2006, just over 20% of male consumed vegetables and food; in contrast, women were gone above 30% and children were almost 27%.
As opposed to, the percentage of people were descending from 2006 to 2008. In 2008,a significant percentages of men took fruits and vegetables and it was about 30%. In contrary men and children took almost 25% and 23% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...strates an overview of the percentage of men, women and children, who were eating...
^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'segment' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'segments'.
Suggestion: segments
...ren, who were eating the different five segment of fruit and vegetables each day in the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsumed vegetables and food; in contrast, women were gone above 30% and children w...
^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'percentage'?
Suggestion: percentage
...rom 2006 to 2008. In 2008,a significant percentages of men took fruits and vegetables and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, in contrast, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95705521472 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81585067386 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2575960475 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212807093816 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111521074515 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11878629848 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170589825661 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13310557882 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.