The bar chart shows the percentages of people, who ate five different parts fruit and vegetables as per day between 2001 to 2008 in United kingdom.
The provided bar chart illustrates an overview of the percentages of ( men, women and children), who were eating the different five segment of fruit and vegetables each day in the UK between 2001 and 2008.
In summary, the percentage of men, women and children were increased significantly. The highest percentages of fruit and vegetables were taken by women while the lowest percentages of goods were achieved by children during the 8 years.
In 2001, the highest percentage of women took a food and it was almost 22 percent were as men and children took nearly 17% and approximately 13% respectively. Similarly, in 2006, just over 20% of male consumed vegetables and food; in contrast, women were go above 30% and children were almost 27%.
As opposed to, the percentage of people were descending ( from 2006 to 2008 ). In 2008,a significant percentages of men took fruits and vegetables and it was approximately 30%. In contrary men and children took almost 25% and 23% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trates an overview of the percentages of men, women and children, who were eating...
^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'segment' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'segments'.
Suggestion: segments
...ren, who were eating the different five segment of fruit and vegetables each day in the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsumed vegetables and food; in contrast, women were go above 30% and children wer...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...bles and food; in contrast, women were go above 30% and children were almost 27%....
^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the percentage of people were descending from 2006 to 2008 . In 2008,a significan...
^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eople were descending from 2006 to 2008 . In 2008,a significant percentages of me...
^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'percentage'?
Suggestion: percentage
...om 2006 to 2008 . In 2008,a significant percentages of men took fruits and vegetables and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, in contrast, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0490797546 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98142674125 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539877300613 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2546613621 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212807093816 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111521074515 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11878629848 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170589825661 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13310557882 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.