The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
The given pie chart exhibits the aftermath of a surveillance regarding the reasons behind the application of mobile phones in an African country. The study was conducted for four years, and it was the on teenagers.
In the beginning of the survey, students used phones exactly for 50 percent for connecting people on various platforms online. This sector experienced the largest segment of the study at the end of the period, and was accounted for 56%. On the other hand, using cell phones for capturing images remained the same at 15% for the first couple of years, but it increased to 20 % in 2019.
The application of phones for sending email experienced a gradual decline throughout the survey. It fell down to 19% in 2019, while it was precisely at 25% in 2016. Students used their phones for making call at the highest rate in 2017, but it had a dramatic decrease in 2019. In the end of the period, this was accounted for only 5%.
Overall, students utilized mobile phones at a greater percentage for social networking, while they applied this device the least for making calls.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he aftermath of a surveillance regarding the reasons behind the application of mo...
^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the on teenagers. In the beginning of the survey, students used phones exac...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., using cell phones for capturing images remained the same at 15% for the first c...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t fell down to 19% in 2019, while it was precisely at 25% in 2016. Students used ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, regarding, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82446808511 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57551877108 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8670047312 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257094201273 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105838442948 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527615839906 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156023124661 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510869330376 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.