The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
The presented line graph compares Australian cities and countrysides in terms of their proportion of the unemployed in the year 2012.
Overall, in 2012, the unemployment rate in the countryside was higher than that in the cities. While the percentage of people out of work in rural areas underwent a downward trend, a substantial rise was recorded in the unemployment rate in urban regions.
At the beginning of the year 2012, the proportion of jobless people in Australian urban areas accounted for approximately 2.2 percent, which was nearly half of the unemployment rate in the countryside. Over the first and the second quarter of the year, there were converse trends for the two figures. Whereas the unemployment rate in Australian cities gradually increased to about 4 percent, the percentage of the unemployed in rural regions witnessed a decline of 1.5 percent.
From the third quarter of the year, both figures had entered a period of instability, ranging between 2 percent and 5.3 percent. At the end of the year 2012, the unemployment rate in Australian rural regions then reached 5 percent, which was almost the same as that in urban areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 67
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 87
- The bar chart shows the percentage of businesses that have social media presence 88
- The pie charts show user s preference on social media channel throughout 3 years period from 2011 until 2013 Social media channels accounted on the charts are Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google and Pinterest 89
- The table shows the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features 47
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, then, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0942408377 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93553444242 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513089005236 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5931712915 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21401276453 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111789473557 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519417463832 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152411650472 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289853858785 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, then, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0942408377 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93553444242 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513089005236 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5931712915 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21401276453 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111789473557 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519417463832 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152411650472 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289853858785 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.