The bar chat illustrates the number of film that screened in the UK and Australia during one year (20010, while the line graph demonstrates the admission for these 2 countries between 1975 to 2005.
In 2001, the cinema admission for Australian reached the peak by approximately 95 million people and for UK people is nearly 140 million but it is not the highest level. During the year, number of US films which screened are more than 3 times the UK films by 75% for UK and more than 65% for Australian. Australian screened film in this year is half of the UK film by more than 10% in UK and 2% in Australia, moreover, the other films were more announced in Australia than UK.
The line graphs indicate British admissions are entirely higher than Australian admission during 3 decades. Australian have upward trend form 30 million in 1975 to 80 million in 2005 and UK declined until 1984 since then it moderately increased to 150 million in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: YEAR_20001[1]
Message: Did you really mean year 20010? Or maybe 'year 2010'?
Suggestion: year 2010
...ened in the UK and Australia during one year 20010, while the line graph demonstrates the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...uring 3 decades. Australian have upward trend form 30 million in 1975 to 80 million i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ined until 1984 since then it moderately increased to 150 million in 2005.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64880952381 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58642425358 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.8077921557 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254543049611 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133807378386 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494036024847 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159184813644 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649423036798 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.