In the age of industrialization, applying car as one of the most important vehicle to transportation and commute is increasingly prevalent. Number of people believes, it makes our living more comfort and causes a myriad of progress in industries, although some individuals have entirely converse idea. I personally assume that the benefits of cars for our towns are fairly outweigh its drawbacks. In the following I will evaluate both sides of this controversial issue.
Firstly, it is undeniable that every vehicle which consumes fuel cause lots of pollution such as air and environmental dirtiness. The oils (gear oil, motor oil, hydraulic oil) that waste are one of detrimental effects moreover, the fuel which burns in the motor is the most prominent cause of air pollution in the towns. In addition riding a transportation tools which made by iron certainly can cause body injury for human beings when it hit every one body.
On the other hand, it is clear that using all kind of automobile eased the transportation and commute, also it helps you to safe your mind and body in the bad weather condition. Cars factories are considered as heavy industries with lots of employees and workers therefore it due to prevent the families to be in austerity. So it not only makes a distinguish advances for industries, but also make a better economical situation for cities.
All in all, I reaffirm my point that car makes our cities more compatible because of aforementioned reasons. Also I believe we will deal with far better circumstances by electrical and hybrid cars arrival that cover all its detrimental effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...nefits of cars for our towns are fairly outweigh its drawbacks. In the following I will ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l issue. Firstly, it is undeniable that every vehicle which consumes fuel cause ...
^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...cause of air pollution in the towns. In addition riding a transportation tools which mad...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o be in austerity. So it not only makes a distinguish advances for industries, but also make ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... for industries, but also make a better economical situation for cities. All in all, I re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ible because of aforementioned reasons. Also I believe we will deal with far better ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that cover all its detrimental effects.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0447761194 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05175524396 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8105284807 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069602179989 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246747480195 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0192249123999 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426423702714 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272366844042 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.