The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where

Essay topics:

The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts describe USA marriage and divorce frequencies between 1970 and 2000, and the relationship status of matured Americans in 1970 and 2000. The frequencies were calculated in the length of millions in number, and the , martial status among adults relationship was counted in percentage.
Overall, the marriages status dominated in every decade, while, the divorces had never reached 1,5 million. That numbers correspondingly meet the married figures in 1970 and 2000. In that given time, married Americans enormously conquered other three statuses.
In the three decades, 1970-2000, the number of marriages population situated between 2 and 2,5 million. In 1970 and 1980, the marriages figures reached 2,5 million, but in 2000 the number decreased a half million. In other conditions, the divorces always stood steady in 1 million, only in 1980 the number increased about a half million.
the married status among adult Americans always stood on the top in two years, 1970 and 2000. fortunately, never married, widowed divorced, could not reach 20%, while married status positioned at 70% and 60% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...n the length of millions in number, and the , martial status among adults relationshi...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he length of millions in number, and the , martial status among adults relationshi...
^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'marriages'' or 'marriage's'?
Suggestion: marriages'; marriage's
...as counted in percentage. Overall, the marriages status dominated in every decade, while...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ion situated between 2 and 2,5 million. In 1970 and 1980, the marriages figures re...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...00 the number decreased a half million. In other conditions, the divorces always s...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...number increased about a half million. the married status among adult Americans al...
^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fortunately
...on the top in two years, 1970 and 2000. fortunately, never married, widowed divorced, could...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41142857143 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78920564501 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1174210893 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237439413906 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111899853328 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940084724339 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15675109691 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544472917602 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.