The charts below give information about the way in which was in different countries in 2000. Water use, selected countreis-2000.
The circular chart and horizontal chart reveals that informantion of representation the way in water was used in different nations in 2000.
Moving a quick glance on the illustration, the world water used in 2000. Hence, the rose proportion in the water used the agriculture in 70. After that, dwellers was used water for agriculture. After-that, industry was nearly by used water in 22 protortion. Then, person was not used the domestic water. It is very lowest percent in the chart in 8.
On the flip side, in 2000 was four nations used the water like canada, new zealand, india and china. Furthermore, india and canada was more used water in the agriculture in 92 proportion.Then, it was not used the domestic and industry are equal ratio and it was very reduced percent 3 to 5 in india.As well as, chinna was used the industry and it is very boomed percent in 69. Last, new zealand was used the water in domestic protortion in 46.
To sum up, dwellers was mostly used the water in the agriculture. It was equal ratio used the water agriculture in india and canada are same proportion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orld water used in 2000. Hence, the rose proportion in the water used the agricu...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hence, the rose proportion in the water used the agriculture in 70. After that, ...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...ter in the agriculture in 92 proportion.Then, it was not used the domestic and indus...
^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...as very reduced percent 3 to 5 in india.As well as, chinna was used the industry a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, then, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71875 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77386660413 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463541666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.251303841 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335589546536 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16308632399 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074395846605 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261587406829 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763665269319 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.