The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.

Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The combination of pie chart and bar graph illustrate the information about the terms of percentage of water which expend by three various sectors such as agriculture, domestic and industry in the whole world and some chooses regions (China, India, New Zealand and Canada) during 2000.

In overall, husbandry constituted a major for using water since least amount of water utilised by domestic fields. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in all sectors which spent water for different purposes over the period.

With regards to the pie chart, it can be seen from the information that between 2000, farming was most popular for expanding water over the worldwide which accounted at seven in ten. Similarly, above a fifth percent of water of the total proportion was used by industry. In contrast, domestic sectors spent only 8% water in the globe.

The bar graph proves that India attained a higher figure for using water for husbandry purpose at 92% followed by China (69%) and New Zealand (44%) from 2000. Likewise, only 8% water expand by Canada on agriculture. Furthermore, Canada utilised a vast amount of water on industry whilst India expand 3% water for same purpose.Even though, New Zealand accounted for 10% of water which used on industry during 2000 and China experienced an almost a little more than two fold increase to over a fifth in specific year. Lastly, the proportion of water expand on domestic works were found at New Zealand (less than a half), Canada (12%), China (9%) and India (5%) respectively in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2000. Likewise, only 8% water expand by Canada on agriculture. Furthermore, Cana...
^^^
Line 13, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Even
... India expand 3% water for same purpose.Even though, New Zealand accounted for 10% o...
^^^^
Line 13, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed an almost a little more than two fold increase to over a fifth in specific yea...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, likewise, similarly, so, in contrast, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99227799228 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58780597464 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3032786207 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.3 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192376388991 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872510260743 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404661613319 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137488118455 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364928673183 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.