The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Two given graphs illustrate the dissimilar amount of water consumed for different sector by four nations in 2000. Overall, it can be seen that in Canada, the amount of water used for industry accounted for the major part, however, the percentage of water consumption was dominant in total.
Looking into detail, with 8%, agriculture was the field used the lowest quantity of water in Canada, in contrast, industry in this country had employed 80% of water by the year 2000, eight time higher than New Zealand water consumption in the same sector.
Moving to other parts of the chart, it is apparent that the proportion of water used for farming consisted of 92% and nearly 70% in India and in China respectively, which led to the dominance of water expenditure in the field of agriculture. Conversely, ranging from 5 to under 50% based on different countries, the water employed to drink or do household just comprised 8% in average.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, industry in this country had employed 80% of water by the year 2000, eight tim...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and in China respectively, which led to the dominance of water expenditure in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, look, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88679245283 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70447564622 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62893081761 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3801408449 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.4 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178160077926 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949464075138 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264840591142 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121973202886 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00788278690908 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.