The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts provide information about the proportion of water usage for several purposes, while the bar graph illustrates the amount of aquatic usage in various countries. Both were taken in the year 2000 and measured in percentages.
Overall, it is noticeable that the amount of water used was dominant for agriculture application, while Canada was high for industrial objectives and India for agricultural usage.
According to the pie charts, the water intake was high for agriculture purposes, which accounted for seven in ten, followed by industrial usage at nearly a quarter, more than three times higher than that of agriculture. Other than that, domestic purposes showed the least at just below one in ten, nearly three times lower than industrial intake.
Turning to the bar charts data, Canada and India showed the most water usage than other countries. Canada used 80% of water for industrial purposes, eight times higher than New Zealand for the same category. Furthermore, India also utilized almost 100% of water for agricultural needs, which was more than doubled compared to New Zealand at 44% . However, for domestic usage, New Zealand accounted at 46% of water being used, making New Zealand the highest among all countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'charts'' or 'chart's'?
Suggestion: charts'; chart's
...ndustrial intake. Turning to the bar charts data, Canada and India showed the most ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n doubled compared to New Zealand at 44% . However, for domestic usage, New Zealan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.265 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63118708318 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9271014472 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127830527756 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607341444685 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268777413253 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865496312635 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280927508372 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.