The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts from the year 2000 illustrate data about population age in Yemen and Italy, and there are two charts giving a projection for 2050.
There are three age groups presented, and both countries saw a decline in the younger population, whereas the over-60-year age group has a tendency to rise.
Looking at the details, in 2000, it can be seen that just over half of the population of Yemen were aged 0-14, compared with only 14.3% in Italy. 15-59 year olds in Yemen also took up 46.3% of the whole population, whereas the older age group only accounted for a small proportion, at 3.6 percent. If we look at Italy, however, there were some differences, as the majority of the population here was aged 15-59, taking up over six-tenths. Meanwhile, the figure for people over 60 years old was under one-fourth, at 24.1%.
Looking ahead to 2050, the Yemen population is predicted to undergo some significant changes, as 15-59 year olds will be now the major part of the population, accounting for 57.3 percent. The number of young children is expected to significantly, while the possible figure for older people would be at 5.7%. Italy, on the other hand, will alter dramatically in terms of population age too. People who are aged under 60 will reduce in number, while the number of older of people is projected to increase and reach 42.3 percent
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed under 60 will reduce in number, while the number of older of people is project...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79237288136 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61128016761 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1486757343 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.1 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178464248212 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805433648153 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692267850208 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132363709888 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866343744027 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.