The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The provided charts illustrate information about the comparison of the population of Yemen and Italy based on ages between 2000 and 2050.
Overall, it can be seen that both two countries had opposite way relationship between each other in all ages group within 50 years.
According to the population of Yemen, the age group of 0-14 was almost the half of the population in 2000 but this figure will be estimated to decrease by 13% from 50.01 to 37.07 respectively in 2050. The other age group 15-59 was the second big population in Yemen with 46.3% while there will be a significant increase of 11% over a fifty-years. Also, the number of over 60 population will be forecast to rise marginally from 3.6% to5.7% between 2000 and 2050.
If we look at details in Italy, by 2050, the number of people who are 15-59 ages are predicted to fall significantly from 61.6 %to 46.2 consecutively. Besides, it is estimated that over 60 population will increase almost double from 24.1% to 42.3% within 50 years, which means that it was eight times higher than Yemen population. However, the population of 0-14 ages group was 14.3% in 2000 while it is forecast that this figure will decline by 3% slightly, reaching 11.5% in 2050.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re will be a significant increase of 11% over a fifty-years. Also, the number of ...
^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...in Italy, by 2050, the number of people who are 15-59 ages are predicted to fall signif...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79716981132 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63474116045 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551886792453 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.436194684 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.125 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284667357536 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15105868845 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123839297486 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214054994209 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151100666992 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.