the pie charts and table give information about the total value of fish imported to the us between 1988 and 2000.
The provided pie charts and table illustrate the proportion of fish that was supplied to the US over the 12 years.
Overall, regarding with pie charts imported fish by Canada showed to decrease significantly year on year whereas there was a considerable growth of fish supply in china. Besides, other countries showed a fluctuation in 12 years. If we look at the table, the total value of fish importation rose slightly from 1988 to 2000.
According to the table, the amount of income from fish supply accounted for almost half from 6.57 to 8.52 to 10.72 respectively over the 12 years. On the other hand, with regards to the pie charts, the US imported the fish from other countries represented to fluctuate slightly which rose by 19 from 27% to 46% in 4 years. Then, there was a moderate decrease of 4% (42%) in 2000.
fish exported by Canada comprised of the highest percentage in 1988 with 60 %. After that, there was a significant fall of almost half to 34% in 1992 to 28% in 2000 while the proportion of fish supply in china grew sharply from 13% to 20% to 30% consecutively between 1988 and 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...supplied to the US over the 12 years. Overall, regarding with pie charts impor...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion rose slightly from 1988 to 2000. According to the table, the amount of in...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... moderate decrease of 4% 42% in 2000. fish exported by Canada comprised of the...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fish
...erate decrease of 4% 42% in 2000. fish exported by Canada comprised of the hig...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, regarding, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66497461929 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61792090139 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3256367486 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298003378932 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125928970057 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087758233207 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196525419855 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058662481224 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.