The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The provided table illustrates information about how many people visited the Ashdown museum before and after redecorated while the given pie charts compare the level of satisfaction by guests in the same two periods.
Overall, it is seen that the number of visitors increased significantly between two times. Although many guests did not be dissatisfied before the renovation, they became satisfied guests after refurbishment.
According to the table, the number of people rose in the two periods, with 74.000 compared to 92.000 respectively. If we look at the results of surveys, dissatisfied people had the most figures before redecorated, with 40. Following this, people who satisfied were double than very willing visitors, at 30 and 15 consecutively. Also, the number of very satisfied visitors were twice higher than no response people, with 10 and 5 sequentially before renewal<span class="hiddenSpellError" pre="before "></span>.
Looking at the details of after refurbishment, the figure of satisfied people grew to 40, which meant that they were the highest group. Moreover, very satisfied people increased almost double after renovation, with 35. However, the number of dissatisfied guests decreased slightly in 15 . Visitors who were very unwilling were less than the first period, with 5. No response and very unsatisfied visitors had the same rate after renewal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...atisfied guests decreased slightly in 15 . Visitors who were very unwilling were l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69047619048 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.66121642885 2.65546596893 138% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0630606403 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5833333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271282989627 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993992371296 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457943246639 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175417846179 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280304314605 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.