It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that some children have owned their abilities such as sports music since they born while the others do not have. However, some people assume that each child can learn these skills to become a profession later. I completely agree that some children have already these talents while the others are not. In this essay, I will look at both sides of the argument and give my opinion.
On one hand, Some people reasonably argue that skills are a special feature and unfortunately every child has not them. The reason is that these abilities are usually transferred by genes. For example, If a family has own musical ability, it is probably that its child has learned everything about music fastly. Also, these children who have abilities can become more successful athletes, actors or singers. As a result, they can achieve more success in their future career.
On the other hand, the others view that children do not need any abilities to become accomplished people and they can be taught what they do correctly. In other words, having good teachers and families promote and encourage their children to be experts in their field. However, there is little evidence to support the view that after learning these skills can come achievement the same as children have talents when they have to spend more effort and learn slowly.
To sum up, although some people wrongly assume that people can gain these abilities later when they are taught, the others conclude that talents are not learned after they born. Personally, I believe that talents is a natural gift and any children should use this in the most correct way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Esther Katlyn | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | morbymuku | 92 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information. 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs. What extent do you agree? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give y 73
- the pie charts and table give information about the total value of fish imported to the us between 1988 and 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve more success in their future career. On the other hand, the others view that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90252707581 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30125645162 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537906137184 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0042054973 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271180848343 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948780835859 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537866889469 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172583741578 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303720954392 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.