Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is argued that public health is developed only by increasing sports centers while the others believe that they have not a huge impact on the improvement of public health and diet and healthy food are more important to develop it. I completely disagree with this point because other measurements are also needed.
Some people simplistically claim that the more the number of sports centers increase the more public health rise in the same way. In other words, regular physical activities can help to be healthy so gym and other sports facilities can support this idea. This is because many people who have an inactive life cannot exercise daily when they work mostly between 8 and 10 hours. However, there is little evidence to support this view that support facilities can just improve society health when these facilities generally are expensive and cannot be afforded to buy a membership or to go to do sport.
On the other hand, the others view fairly argue that sports facilities tend to affect less than diet or healthy eating improvement society health. That is to say that society needs to get used to healthy eating such as vegetables, fish, fruit, and meat. Therefore, people tend to prefer to consume them more than fast food or unhealthy food for their body. Also, if governments decreased the price of healthy foods and increased the price of harmful foods, they would buy more them which beneficial to their health. As a result of, this way is more efficient and advantageous both government's budget and public health than increasing sports centers.
To sum up, although some people wrongly assume that increasing sports places are the best method to improve public health, the others view concludes that diet and healthy foods are more beneficial and more necessary for gaining healthy life. Personally, I believe that firstly government should be more interested in decreasing healthy food's price and increasing fast food's price so this way can be more useful.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up, in the same way, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0303030303 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48995041642 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512121212121 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3979133785 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344041770761 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131014129279 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816856186215 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226210793726 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375607154391 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.