The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided graph illustrates information about the comparison of average carbon dioxide (co2) emitted per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal over a forty-year between 1967 and 2007.
Overall, it is seen that the amount of emission in the united kingdom and Sweden decreased slightly while the figures in Italy and Portugal increased gradually each per decade from 1967 to 2007.
According to the data, the united kingdom had the most number in 1967, with almost 11 tonnes while emissions rate starts to decrease steadily in about 9 tonnes after 40 years. Also, Sweden which had the second highest number in 1967, with nearly 9 tonnes and this figure rose significantly to 10 tonnes in a decade. However, after that year, emission rates declined by 5 tonnes from 10 to 5 tonnes in 2007.
On the other hand, the amount of emission rate in Italy had about 4 tonnes and there was a sharp rise double to roughly 8 tonnes between 1967 and 2007 which meant that it was the second highest number in 2007. Besides, even though Portugal had the least co2 figure in 1967, with around 1 tonne, it climbed considerably from almost 1 to about 5 tonnes respectively in 2007 and this year Sweden rate and Portugal rate were the same.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81944444444 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56399154457 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.159541752 43.030603864 254% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.5 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276370595237 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168576292738 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140849109891 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228050065039 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138408653237 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.