The graph below shows average carbon dioxida (CO2) emmissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the radiation of carbon dioxide (CO2) from 1967 to 2007 in four European Countries. Overall, there fluctuation of the metric tonnes from these nations.
there was a escalated sharply in the emission in Sweden and Portugal. Sweden's radiate the CO2 stood at 10.05 in 1977, higher than the other states. However, the issuance dropped pointedly over the next 10 years to arrived at 7 and in 1987. Following that, carbon dioxide emission falling significantly to 5.25 and cross the similar point with Portugal in 2007. Portugal experienced an increase in previous years likes in 1987 which obtained of 3 while gradually advanced to 5.
In contrast, United Kingdom saw the remained upon at 11 as long as ten years between 1967 to 1977 and next to downward denotatively over the next 30 years to finish at 8.5 in 2007. carbon dioxide radiation from Italy shows rise up by degrees from 1977 to 1997 and embedded to 7.8 as far as 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...he metric tonnes from these nations. there was a escalated sharply in the emission...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tonnes from these nations. there was a escalated sharply in the emission in Sw...
^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Carbon
...next 30 years to finish at 8.5 in 2007. carbon dioxide radiation from Italy shows rise...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51756729547 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630303030303 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.906526802 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165116043773 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625257845311 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483927980354 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112313292444 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211075820736 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.