The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the populations of Yemen and Italy based on three age groups in 2000 and 2050.
Overall, the highest proportion of people in Yemen were aged under 14 while most Italians fell into 15-59 age group in 2000. It is predicted that in 2050, populations of both nations will show an increase in the percentage of elderly people.
In 2000, over 60% of citizens in Italy fell into 15-59 age bracket, compared to that of Yemen, at roughly 45%. Similarly, the elderly Italians made up approximately one-fourth of their population, yet the figure for Yemen was trivial (3.6%). In contrast, a half of Yemen’s population were children, while the data of Italy was significantly lower, with just under 15%.
In the year 2050, the proportion of 15-to 59-year-olds in Yemen will be on the rise, to about 57%, while that of Italy will drop dramatically by roughly 15%. In addition, it is predicted that the figures for people who will be aged over 60 in Yemen and Italy will both climb by 2.1% and 18.2% respectively. However, the forecast shows that there will be a decrease in the percentages of children in these countries, to 37% and 11.5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... will drop dramatically by roughly 15%. In addition, it is predicted that the figu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78109452736 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68809611919 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557213930348 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.9567316187 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193765699099 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946117357137 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690635944464 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153342881902 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685301665965 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.