The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular school in 1981,1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
A glance at three charts demonstrated annual expenditure in a particular school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Overall, there are two main groups illustrated in the graph: single trends including increase or decrease, and couple trends including both increase and decrease.
In the first group, it is indicated that the expenditure on insurance climbed up tediously form 1981 to 2001, form a minority percentage to roughly 10%. Other workers' salaries, on the contrary, experienced a noticeable collapse of 13%, this figure only stood at 15% in 2001.
In the second group, even though teachers' salaries were invested the most to one half in 1991, this figure declined by 5% in 2001. Similarly, there was an impressive expenditure on resource books in 1991, which was one-fifth in 1991, the spending on this went down dramatically to 9% after 10 years. Meanwhile, furniture and equipment experienced a decrease of 10% in the investment, but it was financed up to 23% in 2001.
In conclusion, the changes in all features are changed considerably with the mass expenditure was always for teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wo main groups illustrated in the graph: single trends including increase or decr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, similarly, so, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15730337079 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94763454749 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9769054919 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185742862977 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844664647998 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941889002447 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10416688741 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485997833376 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.