The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A quick glance at the two pie charts reveals energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions produced by an average Australian household. Overall, the energy was mainly used for heating whereas emissions came from water heating.
Regarding the first pie chart, heating made up the largest population in energy use (42%), followed by water heating (30%). Other appliances consisted of 15% and refrigeration accounted for 7% of energy consumption. An insignificant percentage of household power was used for lightning. Only 2& of energy was consumed for colling.
Regarding the second chart, despite the largest consumption of heating, this activity only produced 15% of greenhouse gas emissions. On the contrary, water heating was to blame for the greatest amount of gas release (32%). Other appliances made of 28% in this discharge. Even though refrigeration and lightning consisted up a slight proportion of energy use, the percentage of gas they produced doubled that of energy consumption, 14% and 8% respectively. Lastly, colling made up a minor percentage, 32%.
In conclusion, an average Australian household used energy for different purposes with the main use of heating and gas emissions was produced by water heating.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, regarding, second, whereas, as to, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48947368421 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01762596788 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0633224904 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9166666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323733055159 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126081368314 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906834486885 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247940569853 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705627320359 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.