The charts below give the information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the current trends in the age groups of population in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and proposal changes in its distribution over a period of 50 years.
Overall, previously the majority of people in Yemen correlates to the age group from childhood to teens (from 0 to 14 years old), that could be potentially changed by the end of 2050. However, in Italy people in the age of 15-59 accounted for more than 60% of population in the 2000. But in conjectures with foreseeable future the prevalence will be decreased by almost 15%.
Turning to the Yemen distribution over the lap of 50 years, we notice that number of respondents, who are in the age from zero to 14 will be potentially decreased by 13%. That amount will undergo the major changes and could be equal to 37%. The elderly people, vice versa, will have a potential rise in its number, closing up the 2050 in quantity of 5,7%.
In comparison with Italian retired people, their percentage distribution is rather significant. It is apparent, that there is an ageing in the Italian population: the number of elderly people will be double risen in 50 years from 21,4% to almost 43%. Moreover, the amount of youngsters will be reduced by 3% and will be equal to 11% only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ng up the 2050 in quantity of 5,7%. In comparison with Italian retired people, their perc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64705882353 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69785731693 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.471508712 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121621693363 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536867717664 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602844952818 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913856305177 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568968520719 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.