The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The given four different pie charts compare several age groups of people who were living in Yemen and Italy between 2000 and 2050.
Overcall, it can be deemed that the group of 60 and over years old decreased by 3.6% in 2000 and 5.7% in 2050 in Yemen while they increased in Italy by 24.1% and 42.03% in 2000 and 2050 respectively.
First of all, the individuals of 0 to 14 years old were 50.1% in 2000 in Yemen while the number will drop by 37.0% in 2050. Moreover, the second team from 15 to 69 years were no more than 46.3% in 2000 when they will cline in with the majority of percentage which will 57.03 percent in 2050. In addition, the population who were 50 and more had a tiny portion which was 3.6% in 2000 which will rise slightly by 5.7%. in 2050.
However, the people of O to l4 years age group were 14.3%. in 2000 whereas they will decrease by 11.5% in 2050 in Italy. Furthermore, 15 to 59 years old population increased rapidly by 61.6% in 2000 when the proportion will fell down by 46.2% in 2050. Therefore, no more than 24.1%, 60 and over older individuals were in 2000 which will improve with double by 42-3%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... 2000 which will rise slightly by 5.7%. in 2050. However, the people of O to l4...
^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... of O to l4 years age group were 14.3%. in 2000 whereas they will decrease by 11.5...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34272300469 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24409216773 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49765258216 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7640028808 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 5.23603664747 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241952593969 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125541450359 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719283072902 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185643318292 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509354137602 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.43 61.2550243902 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.