The charts below provide the primary reason tourists visited Orange City in two different years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie-charts represent the main purpose of visiting Orange city by tourists in two different years. In addition, the total number of tourists in both years is also mentioned.
Overall, the number of tourists visiting Orange city rose from 1 million to 1.9 million. Although tourist's interest in annual events got slightly reduced from 2006 to 2016, it remained as one of the major reason for tourists to visit the city. On the other hand, a dramatic increase has been observed in the visitors interested in the restaurants in 2016, whereas, the percentage of visitors attraction for Museums got reduced significantly.
In 2006, 72% of the whole population were likely towards visiting events and museums as their primary interest, where the contribution was 45% and 27% respectively . while theatre visitors were 13% and the restaurant was the least interest as 10%.
However, Visitors increase towards the restaurant skyrocketed to 41% in 2016, where events and restaurants together contribute 73% of the total interest. while interest in Museums and Theatre fell moderately, to 11% and 8% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ontribution was 45% and 27% respectively . while theatre visitors were 13% and the...
^^
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ribution was 45% and 27% respectively . while theatre visitors were 13% and the resta...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...r contribute 73% of the total interest. while interest in Museums and Theatre fell mo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36931818182 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88384737749 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9987079909 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182620763637 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877553407372 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118961130572 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123633857659 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107886804838 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.