The three pie charts illustrate the proportions of three nutrients (sodium, saturated fat and added sugar) being in the daily meals of the USA people that overusing them may be harmful.
As regards the first, dinner has the overwhelming amounts of sodium and saturated fat (43% and 37% respectively) among all of the meals, and the added sugar is the main ingredient of the snacks in the figure of 42%. By looking at the pie chart, it is obvious that a mere 14% of sodium is in breakfast as well as snacks, and also a tiny minorities of saturated fat and added sugar (both 16%) are in the former. Therefore, dinner by having approximately the highest rate of two ingredients ( sodium:43%, saturated fat:37%) is the most unhealthy meal among others, followed by snacks because of its noticeable amount of added sugar (42%). It is worth noting that breakfast can be categorized in healthy meal’s group, and lunch is virtually a normal daily meal in terms of the nutrients.
To conclude, all the daily meals contain the related ingredients to some extent, but dinner and snacks are more harmful meals because of having the high proportion of nutrients and breakfast can be considered the least detrimental meal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ated fat 43% and 37% respectively among all of the meals, and the added sugar is the main ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'minority'?
Suggestion: minority
...fast as well as snacks, and also a tiny minorities of saturated fat and added sugar both 1...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tely the highest rate of two ingredients sodium:43%, saturated fat:37% is the mos...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dinner and snacks are more harmful meals because of having the high proportion of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, may, so, therefore, well, as regards, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8640776699 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71725008342 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533980582524 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.7054001888 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.0 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141357701022 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790755426159 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548005681633 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122557274534 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451942530043 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.