The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
These pie charts illustrate the proportion of four typical meals containing three different nutritional values on average which might be harmful, unless it is consumed moderately. The data is taken from the United States of America.
During dinner, almost twice as much sodium is consumed as added sugar, 43% and 23% respectively. In addition, 37% of this meal accounts for saturated fat. Regarding lunch meal, there is no great deal of difference between sodium (29%) and saturated (26%), however the figure for added sugar is nearly one-fifth. When it comes to snacks, there is a far more proportion of added sugar than sodium and saturated fat, 42%, 21% and 14% in turn. A similar percentage of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar consumed in breakfast is around 14-16% which means that this meal contains significantly lower amount of nutrients.
Overall, it is clear that in the USA sodium is consumed relatively more in both lunch and dinner, however, snack meals contain substantial amount as much added sugar as any other nutrients. An interesting point is that the share of all nutrients of breakfast is almost the same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rients of breakfast is almost the same.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05347593583 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66279018002 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614973262032 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1164077023 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112618685322 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482658960946 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491317931797 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090528168036 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413261610329 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.