By enormous population increase and technological advancement, our planet has being destroyed gradually, and if abrupt remedies do not undertake for saving it, it will be uninhabitable for all of creatures in the future. Of course, there are many environmental problems that we can deal with them, but there are some paramount issues that should be prioritized.
First of all, some people may believe that preserving rare plants and animals is compulsory. They point out that by abolishing them from the food chain of creatures, the remained wildlife may be in danger of extinction. Then, they suggest that keeping them in captivity and having breeding programs, can be ameliorate the problem to some extent. As it can be seen now in theme parks, zoos or protected zones where rare plants and animals are kept and environmentalism try to help to protect them as well as possible.
On the other hand, the vast majority of environmental problems need to be solved and considered that are more important than extinction of some animals and plants. The first issue is the environmental pollution and the impacts of it on ecosystem. After civilization, the number of factories increased enormously, and they posed the problem of air pollution by releasing pollutants. This means that the greenhouse gases increased and ozone layer depletion was one the harmful consequences that led to global warming, causing drought and famine in some areas. Furthermore, industrial estates are built in countrysides that their sewages pour into the rivers and seas causing water pollution. Then, the marine creatures all face with the harmful food chain, causing death and human being also are in the threat of death as well.
To sum up, having the fear of extinction of particular species is a simplistic view because there are other paramount problems like air and water pollution that should be prioritized. The problem of pollution can destroy life of all creatures on the earth that is an unbelievable global disaster.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ount issues that should be prioritized. First of all, some people may believe th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vironmental pollution and the impacts of it on ecosystem. After civilization, the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, well, of course, as well as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16513761468 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92260358647 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562691131498 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5998882135 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.642857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195883059397 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712238403037 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654332396735 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118164369814 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201656418108 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.