The Charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The Charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The pie charts illustrate the average amount of three kinds of nutrients in four meals of breakfast, lunch, snacks, and dinner. Overall, sodium and saturated fat nutrients rank the highest amount in dinner meals. Besides, added sugar is seen by maximum measure (quantity) in snacks.// Overall, it seems as if Breakfast and Lunch are healthier than Snacks and Dinner in an average American eating habits./ eating life-style
As mentioned above, Breakfast and Lunch comparing to other meals manifest to be healthier. Regarding Breakfast, an average American consumes 14% Sodium and 16% Saturated fat and Added Sugar, each. Furthermore, Lunch constitutes 29% Sodium, 26% Saturated fat and 19 percent added sugar. As can be seen, There is a little difference between breakfast nutrients amount while lunch`s is in range of 2-10 quantity.
On the other side, Dinner and Snacks seems unhealthier than other meals, considering Sodium by the most percentage of 43 and Saturated fat and Added sugar are comprised 37% and 23 percent respectively in diner. Moreover, Americans consume significant amounts of added sugar by the percentage of 42 and 21% Saturated fat in Snack, at least 14% Sodium of this meal. Regarding Dinner measure, differences are through 6-20 percentage and there are 7-28 differences in breakfast quantities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31330472103 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79704546204 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55364806867 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4592547954 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193605428521 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104271621421 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178097635834 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207685597672 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.242441495615 0.0819641961636 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.