The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These pie charts illustrate the average proportions of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks in the United States of America. Three types of nutrients may be unhealthy if people eat enormously.
To begin with, it is clear that dinner contains most of the sodium and saturated fat at the rate of 43% and 37%, respectively. On the other hand, dinner accounts for 23% added sugar, which is the second-highest percentage/which is relatively small compared with snacks. In addition to this, sodium and saturated fat consumed for/at lunch contribute the second-largest amount at 29% and at 26%, respectively. On the contrary, lunch contains only 19% of added sugar.
Talking about snacks, they have the most enormous amount of added sugar, reaching 42%. However, 21% of saturated fat, followed by sodium at 14%, is consumed at snacks. Finally, breakfast contributes to the lowest rate of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar. The percentage of saturated fat and added sugar at breakfast is the same, showing 16%, followed by sodium at 14%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, second, so, in addition, talking about, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22285714286 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88910126552 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0975072403 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1 5.23603664747 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0647991137265 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363317366455 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590360563429 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658922977405 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578063930418 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.