The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Picture address: https://ielts-thanhloan.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/5.png
The two line graphs show the figures of 3 electrical equipments owned by households and the time spending for household chores between 1920 and 2019.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a contrast between 2 charts. While the first graph had an upward trends, the remaining one showed the contrary fashion.
In the first chart, it is clear that in 1920, only 5% of family owned Refrigerator which was 6 and 8 times lower than the percentage of vacuum cleaner and Washing machine, respectively. However, the year 1980 had marked a significant changes in the figures of the 3 appliances, thanks to the change in consumption habits of consumpmer, the possession of Refrigerator had increased to 100% which was only 10% higher than the figure of Vacuum cleaner and at the end of the process, both of these appliances had achived the same highest proportion. The number of households owning Washing machine had experienced a fluctuation before reaching at about 65% in 1980 and making a slight rise of 10% in 2019.
In the second chart, most people spent 50 hours per week doing household chores. However, this number had decreased to about 15% in 1980 before leveling off in the next 20 years and slightly dropping to only 10% in the last year of the process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ousehold chores between 1920 and 2019. Overall, it can be seen that there was a...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ining one showed the contrary fashion. In the first chart, it is clear that in ...
^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
... the year 1980 had marked a significant changes in the figures of the 3 appliances, tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... making a slight rise of 10% in 2019. In the second chart, most people spent 5...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81278538813 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67462221069 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593607305936 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.7481988286 43.030603864 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.75 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166149653904 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763373146834 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063091713977 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110892875993 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686918996068 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.