The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first line chart compares the proportion of families from a same country owning three disntict kinds of electrical appliances from 1920 to 2109. The second line chart illustrates the trend of time spent on housework in households of one country during the same period.
It is noticeable that more families owned electric machines in their house and every family in the country had a refrigerator and a vacuum cleaner. At the same time, people spent less time on housework.
In 1920, there was no families that preferred to have a refrigerator while the demand of refrigerators had a big increase in the further 60 years, the owning proportion of refrigerators reached 100%. Vacuum cleaners had the same trend and achived 100% posession in 2000. The requirement of washing machines rose to the first peak in 1960, with 70% posession and had a decrease in 1980 by 6%. After 1980, the number of households owning washing machines rose at a stable rate, with 74% in 2019.
The second chart shows a decline of hours spending on housework since 1920. At first each family spent 50 hours a week doing housework, and this figure decreased significantly in the next 40 years, with 20 hours per week. The speed of declined time slow down after 1960, and decreased to 10 hours per week on housework in 2019.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mand of refrigerators had a big increase in the further 60 years, the owning prop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82222222222 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64993268025 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528888888889 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3630221083 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6363636364 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197308920271 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853923705922 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069839099805 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130568656855 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682799467337 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.