The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two line graphs delineating the rate of the family units possessing electronics namely washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner and the figure of household chores' hours during a period of nearly one century, commencing from 1920 to 2019.
It is perceptible that the proportion of the ownership of electrical devices leaped significantly while the hours of doing housework plummeted dramatically over the provided years.
As information revealed in the first line graph, standing at 40% in 1920, the rate of households using washing machines surged to 70% in 1960 and then diminished moderately to more than 65% 20 years later, before recovering and reaching its zenith of approximately 75% in the last year. Meanwhile, the percentage of the owners having the refrigerator experienced a gap of an escalation to 100% in the first 60 years even though no one purchased this item in 1920. Likewise, that of the vacuum cleaner's ownerships achieved 100% in the last 19 years after a 70% proliferation in the 1920s.
In terms of the data of hours spent on housework weekly, it cost people 50 hours in 1920; however, in 2019 only 10 hours were recorded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two line graphs delineating the rat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03608247423 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92253495156 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654639175258 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1758995686 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.833333333 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14471408959 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671465530842 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027935514799 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862322080305 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157680357979 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.