The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts below illustrate the proportion of domestic possession of electrical equipment and how much time is allocated for household chores in one country over a century, starting in 1920.
It is clear that there is an upward trend for all types of families’ electrical appliances throughout the period from 1920 to 2019. Consequently, less time is spent on housekeeping.
In 1920, refrigerators accounted for only a negligible percentage - downward of a half, whereas washing machines and vacuum cleaners were precisely 40% and 30% respectively. Just after two decades, both washing machines and vacuum cleaners rose slightly. However, the most prominent data is refrigerators, which is an outstanding growth that made the percentages of the three details approximately the same, with almost half of the families owning them. The washing machine went through ups and downs before increasing steadily and ending the period at just under 70 %. At that point, almost households have for themselves at least a refrigerator and a vacuum cleaner.
In addition to the increase in electric equipment, the number of hours spent on doing housework dropped sharply. It started at 50 hours per week, after which it fell peaked at just under 10 hours in 1980, before ending the period at about 10 hours a day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two charts below illustrate the prop...
^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry over a century, starting in 1920. It is clear that there is an upward tren...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, less time is spent on housekeeping. In 1920, refrigerators accounted for onl...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t a refrigerator and a vacuum cleaner. In addition to the increase in electric ...
^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the period at about 10 hours a day.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, whereas, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20379146919 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94078151257 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63981042654 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1823559382 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122372510838 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514687420837 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642062289613 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970281177347 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727782791226 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.