Some people think it is more important to plant more trees in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that plantations in vacant lots in towns and cities are more essential than housing construction. To a certain extent, I agree that planting trees will provide citizens and the environment with numerous benefits. However, I also think that building more shelters and apartments in those areas will help develop many aspects of society. And this essay will address the reasons for my views as follows.
On the one hand, I would agree that trees and flowers are necessary in order to improve the air quality, provide more shade and noise reduction for city residents. There is an obvious fact that industrialization in urban areas caused trees to be cut down and replaced by tall glass buildings. This is the key factor in rising environmental pollution so growing more trees in open areas is important because this will increase a huge amount of oxygen and filter out harmful gases. According to a recent survey, a variety of roads in Vietnam are greened and being encouraged to be green by the government. In addition, under the shade and the quiescence coming from the boughs with luxuriant foliage, people can take a rest after the hectic days in life. This is not only good for mental and physical health but also brings prettier landscapes to the downtown. That’s why people have the International day of forest approved by the United States every year.
On the other hand, I also think that building shelters in vacant areas are just as crucial as planting trees. Firstly, the lack of houses will enhance the rental price so citizens will hardly obtain their own homes and have a wide range of pressure in the financial sector. Thus, the proportion of homeless people and crimes will grow up significantly, and it also leads to more social evils. Secondly, the youth often tend to move to the city to study, work, and start a business due to its convenience and modern living conditions that it is too hard and costly to change those habits. For instance, if we construct more buildings in the hometown, commuters have to go a long distance for work, and the government has to spend money to upgrade service quality in the suburbs while we can use the quality in the city which has reached a certain level that is hard to replace. These things reduce productivity and cost a large amount of money from shipping to modification.
In conclusion, why I support the view that planting trees in urban areas is a key contribution to influencing how efficiently people and the environment could gain, I disagree that providing more housing is not important with many negative consequences of its lack above.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 452.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82522123894 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66865428233 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1542476522 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32763911877 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875105599993 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838175369857 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211618737139 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649453542965 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 452.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82522123894 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66865428233 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1542476522 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32763911877 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875105599993 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838175369857 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211618737139 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649453542965 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.