The charts below show how average middle-income families spend their household budget in two different years. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Two charts illustrate the budget allocation of average middle-income families in 2012 and 2015. In 2012, the budget was split roughly evenly between housing, food and clothes, pastime activities and miscellaneous needs. In contrast, in 2015 half of the money was spent on housing alone.
During the first period, 60% of the budget was spent on the paramount needs: accommodation and food/clothes (35% and one quarter respectively). 25% of the money was used for spare time’s sake and holidays. The rest (15%) was spent on different needs.
On the other hand, in 2015 housing demanded 50% of the family’s money, while food and clothes required 35%. For free time activities, families spent only 10% of their funds. The remaining was spend on other needs.
Overall, there was a significant redistribution in middle-class families’ money spending. For instance, the amount of money needed for accommodation rose by 15% between 2012 and 2015, whilst food and clothes started to require 10% more of the budget. Thus, other demands needed to be cut.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,  
... housing alone. During the first period, 60% of the budget was spent on the para...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...y 10% of their funds. The remaining was spend on other needs. Overall, there was a s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, thus, while, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28965860561 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0436759237 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107955786262 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504785088335 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723696999503 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744817289419 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043100249458 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.