Some people think that students who achieve the best academic results should be rewarded. Others believe it is more important to reward students who show improvement.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people argue that universities should support students who achieve high goals in research, whilst others say that the improvement ought to be rewarded. I think that both points of view are valid and bring benefit for universities.
First of all, the university is a place when new knowledge is acquired by students. Research is a paramount way to achieve new knowledge, so it must be promoted and supported by the higher school. Furthermore, research is done not only by the academic staff but also by students who are passionate about science. By providing such students with incentives (stipends, grants), university enhances its own ability to carry out research. For example, plenty of universities in Europe have research institutes instead of faculties, and students are involved in the scientific practice sinse the first term.
On the other hand, university prepares people to start a job or career by giving them essential information via the process of education. Some people do not have problems understanding new information, while others do. Those who need an improvement should be encouraged because without the improvement they are likely to not attain their personal aims like a start of new job. It could also affect university's prestige. Hence, the improvement in grades must be promoted. For instance, Einstein had problems in school. Had he not been inspired to remedy the situation by his teacher, he would not have become the greatest physicist in the world.
In conclusion, I believe that universities should endorse not only students participation in research but also those who show the enhancement of educational abilities. Such practice will be beneficial for university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... providing such students with incentives stipends, grants, university enhances it...
^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...at universities should endorse not only students participation in research but also thos...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29889298893 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9804627005 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60147601476 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5839706773 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.75 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258690659084 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753478387881 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783027051075 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181643516313 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850915018944 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.