The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie chart compares the government's financial budget in the year 2010 and 2015
In the year 2010 the majority of government funds were provided to healthcare and education sectors which collectively comprises of almost 50 percent of total funds. But the expenditures were reduced in both the sectors by 1 percent and 4 percent respectively in five years. Also, the defense sector was funded by 17 percent in 2010 which was reduced to 14 percent in 2015. The expenses on transport, cultures and others were also reduced by 1 percent.
However, the expenses in welfare sectors and interests on borrowing was noticeably increase from last five years. The goverment spent twice as before on interest on burrowing and increased 5 percent fundings in welfare sectors.
Between these five years the pension sectors expenditure remained the same.
In conclusion, the goverment had to cut down on expeses in healthcare, education adn others sectors to increase the funding in welfare and interest on borrowing sectors.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...nd education sectors which collectively comprises of almost 50 percent of total funds. But t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...d interests on borrowing was noticeably increase from last five years. The goverment spe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23780487805 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79937822407 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542682926829 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2839755361 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0796444851664 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349880455966 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464466319881 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588360054803 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702308911519 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...nd education sectors which collectively comprises of almost 50 percent of total funds. But t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...d interests on borrowing was noticeably increase from last five years. The goverment spe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23780487805 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79937822407 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542682926829 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2839755361 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0796444851664 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349880455966 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464466319881 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588360054803 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702308911519 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.