The first bar chart given reveals some information with regard to the percentages of the two reasons for studying by various ages of pupils, with the second bar chart illustrating the amount of supporting by entrepreneurs (time and money) according to age variation.
As can be seen, there are stark contrasts between two reasons in the majority of age groups. One of the most noticeable features of the reason chart is that the numbers for career plummet down dramatically, nosedive by approximately 30 percent as ages increase while the number of interest reason skyrocket, climbing from 10% in under 26 to 70% in over 49 years. Interesting, the figures are range from 10% for under 26 for interest to 80% for under 26 years for career reason, of which the number of carrier reason is as high as that of interest in 40-49 years, with not being quite as high as that of under 26, 22-29 and 30-39 years put together. Similarly, the figures of interest reason at over 49 years was as high as that of the carrier reason in 26-29 years. Interesting, career reason comes out top in three-fourths of ages group.
Turning to the employer support chat the numbers decline, heating a dip of 30% in 30-39 years. This drop is short-lived; however, as the next years bring a negligible climb to just about 40% in further 49 years.
It is worth mentioning that entrepreneurs and employers allocate more than half of their support by money and time for younger students under 30 years due to being more active and productive than the oldest one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'entrepreneurs'' or 'entrepreneur's'?
Suggestion: entrepreneurs'; entrepreneur's
...llustrating the amount of supporting by entrepreneurs time and money according to age variati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, similarly, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73880597015 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.652877488 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518656716418 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.2094584688 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.111111111 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7777777778 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152863978988 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685333289863 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475321759128 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900443735802 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611672300374 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.