Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Today, there are plenty of elements that threaten human's health such as unhealthy foods, air pollutants, stress and so on. Scientists claim that consuming fast food is harmful for human's health, some of them considered that the key to alleviate this issue is to educate people, while there are some who suggest that studying people will not aid.
Two main arguments are usually put forward by the advocates of educating people. For one thing, human's health has been threatened by various elements such as junk food consumption. Moreover, the majority of the people are not aware of its impact on health. For instance, people are not aware of unhealthy materials, their high amount of calories and so on. Consequently, by awaring people about its potential impact on health such as dangerous diseases, probably can diminish its consumption and people may change their habit of eating. For another, fast food producers and food's industries can give essential information and notice people about food's nutrition and materials that have been made up of, by putting some notice boxes and labels in food packaging in order to increase consumer's information and awareness.
There are points in support of not being a useful way as well. these modern industrialized world cause people having inadequate time for preparing natural foods so they prefer to eat fast food to save their time so they spend their time with their family instead. Similarly, fast food offers convenience for people and they are actually attractive especially for children. Also eating unhealthy food becomes a habit for today's people especially in advanced countries. Consequently, it is really hard to convince people not to eat junk foods. More importantly, these foods cost less than organic and healthy foods so a wide range of people affords to buy these foods even needy people. Therefore, people prefer to spend less money on buying food and save their money and time.
It can be concluded that both views can be rational. To recapitulate, whereas educating people can broaden their horizons about junk food, unhealthy food offers convenience and they become today's people habit of eating and they have marginal cost compared with organic foods as a wide range of people can buy them. I hold the view that educating people is not prudent to mitigate this problem as junk food offers convenience so people can save both time and money when the financial problem is one of the major problems in this modern world.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...port of not being a useful way as well. these modern industrialized world cause peopl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...lly attractive especially for children. Also eating unhealthy food becomes a habit f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly in advanced countries. Consequently, it is really hard to convince people not...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, may, moreover, really, similarly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, such as, for one thing

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05596107056 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54702576272 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489051094891 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2930374298 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321808775752 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111235598017 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665988020128 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216602880547 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375883640778 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.