The line graph given reveals some information with regard to the amount of dollars spent by four diverse country on investigation of a renewable source of energy between 1975 and 2000.
As can be seen there were two general trends upward and downwars. With regard to the first, the numbers for Denmark experience a slight escalation to $1 in 1980, where remained steady for 10 years.This plateau was short lived; however, as the next decade brought an exponentially growth to approximately 7.5 dollars. Switzerland also witnessed a steep escalation, rising erratically to $5 during this period.
The trends for UK and Spain; however, were downward, albert by varying degrees, with the figures for the former climbed, rising to the 1 mark in 1980. This climb was followed by a slight decline, albeit fitfully to about 0.5 in 2000. Turning to Spain, the figures went up, rising to just above $1; and subsequently there was a deep in 1985 to approximately 0.5 and then Bouncing Back in 1990. the numbers, next, decline to just above $0 in 2000.
It is worth mentioning that, the amount dollers spent by Spain was more than that of other three countries put together in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rce of energy between 1975 and 2000. As can be seen there were two general tr...
^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enmark experience a slight escalation to in 1980, where remained steady for 10 ye...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...980, where remained steady for 10 years.This plateau was short lived; however, as th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('exponentially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...ed; however, as the next decade brought an exponentially growth to approximately 7.5 dollars. Switzerla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... steep escalation, rising erratically to during this period. The trends for UK...
^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ely 0.5 and then Bouncing Back in 1990. the numbers, next, decline to just above sh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, then, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93908629442 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67358778149 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654822335025 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8011106879 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122281878504 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485764680431 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087305194358 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960442882575 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112523896942 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.