Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about workable solutions to the problem of fast food consumption that harm the human’s health. While some people argue that education can solve this issue, I believe that measure is not efficient.
On the one hand, there is a common belief that education can tackle the issue of junk food overconsumption because of two key reasons. Firstly, education can help people comprehend serious harm of fast food that can significantly affect people's health. For example, through the media, such as on television or articles, authorities can frequently educate people on the considerable damage of eating too much junk food. Secondly, education programmes related to nutrition knowledge play an important role in raising residents’ awareness of consuming wholesome food. As a result, people are likely to reduce an excessive dependence on fast food.
On the other hand, I strongly endorse that education measure is not effective to prohibit junk food overeating. The first supporting point for the view is that in the modern life, residents tend to be more ambitious. For instance, they devote most of their time to earning money and pursuing a successful career. Thus, those individuals choose fast food as their main priorities due to its convenience. Moreover, because of an extremely low price, fast food still receive special attention of a great number of poor people whose major priority are money instead of their health.
In conclusion, although there are some reasonable arguments in favour of education solution, it seems to me this measure is pointless to deal with the problem of fast food overeating.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
... career. Thus, those individuals choose fast food as their main priorities due to it...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29770992366 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88540530573 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603053435115 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6458493424 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319087992 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11400476386 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624625458867 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193013256647 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539138872308 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.