The bar graph given below shows that the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education, which includes both developed and developing countries. The comparison of data reported on the basis of the year 1990 to 1998.
The primary education in developing countries has a higher rate for girls in both the years, whereas, in developing countries, it is changed and increased from 83 girls to 87 girls in 1998. In contrast, the secondary education provided to the girls in 1990 has slightly decreased rate as compared to primary education in developing countries and it has added 10 more girls in the next 8 years. While the developed countries have prominently touched the target rate by 98 girls and 99 girls in two comparative years.
Lastly, when we talk about the tertiary education the rate of giving education to the girls in this sector is relatively low as compare to other two sectors, the developing countries have only 66 girls over 100 boys in the 1990 and acquire lesser 25 girls as compared to the target in 1998. However, the developed countries had drastically highest rate in this sector and also among all three sectors which crossed the target ratio by 105 girls in the year 1990 and more 7 girls added in 1998.
In conclusion, the developing countries had the lowest rate of girls in all three levels of education as compared to developed countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the basis of the year 1990 to 1998. The primary education in developing countri...
^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'drastically the highest'.
Suggestion: drastically the highest
...8. However, the developed countries had drastically highest rate in this sector and also among all ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...7 girls added in 1998. In conclusion, the developing countries had the lowest ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, lastly, second, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80334728033 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61747503802 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451882845188 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8299078117 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172971165445 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103168658308 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816222726332 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148325075275 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106971018129 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.