The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurent meals in diffrent years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurents and sit-down restaurents.
The Supplied pie chart illustrates information about the proportion of income which utilize on restaurent meals and home made cooking and the line graph represent the average of junk food and sitting restaurent meals from year 1970 to 2000.
Overall, the percentage of home made food was decreased during the 30 years period , while , number of junk food meals touched to highest point.
Having a myopic outlook, in the year 1970 mos of the people prefered to home cooking and only one tenth families utilize their money on outside foods. After 10 years more than five percentage budget spent on restaurent meals as compared to previous amount. Moreover, the home made cooking percentage was declined in the year 1990 while, after one decade both meals proportion was recorded as a same.
On further analysis of line graph, in beginning year both meals average was recorded equivalent, which was just 20. After one year the junk food and sitting restaurent meals was inclined and reached to round 31 and 28 respectively (number of meals). During the last given years junk food average significantly rised and touched to peak point whereas, restaurent meals slightly inclined and reached at approximately 50 (number of meals).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...was decreased during the 30 years period , while , number of junk food meals touch...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eased during the 30 years period , while , number of junk food meals touched to hi...
^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...ile , number of junk food meals touched to highest point. Having a myopic outlook, in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1144278607 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54708862479 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2366049139 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389415096845 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18926129832 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914933887659 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255220068146 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605754156271 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.