Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
The world have never faced excessive spread of modern technology before. It is irrefutable that, the nano technology affected people relationship in various ways and in my opinion its has both negative and positive effects.
To begin with, The technology effects masses relationship on education, business and socializing. First and foremost is, with the help of internet and telephone business man can attend meetings and easily communicate from one to another country people. There are number of apps which are extremely helpful for not only business apps but also for storage data. For example, gmail is one of the best application for write letter and send documents. people can easily reflected their important notice by bold and underline the word.
Secondly, technology makes new relation of student and teacher by attending online classes. The learners can easily understand the topic by video calling. Finally, The number of people uses internet for entertainment they use number of social apps such as Facebook, Instagram and Whats app. By these applications the spend their leisure time and also make new friends from another nations.
On the one hand, due to the advancement of technology people can save their time and money. To illustrate, in the ancient time people usually talk with their relation and other person by written letters which take much time for deliver the notice But, now a days they can easily communicate with each other by video calling and text messages. On the other hand, most of the new generation totally dependent on electronic gadgets. They always preferred to video games and mobile games instead of outdoor activities. Which becomes their nature not more aggressive but also harmful their health in the future. Hence, they do not make new friends which can cause weakness of virtual relationship.
To conclude, Although the modern developments provide number of opportunities to people but in some situations it has bad effects on people behaviors which cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and positive effects. To begin with, The technology effects masses relationsh...
^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...on for write letter and send documents. people can easily reflected their important no...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...al apps such as Facebook, Instagram and Whats app. By these applications the spend th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...am and Whats app. By these applications the spend their leisure time and also make new fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 253, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...e much time for deliver the notice But, now a days they can easily communicate with each o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 257, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...ch time for deliver the notice But, now a days they can easily communicate with each o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25925925926 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66303479244 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8556326204 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239457581837 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695292332653 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728125096091 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140166467731 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706265622181 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.