The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the average number of meals eaten in fast-food restaurants and sit-down restaurants per family.
The chart provides information about the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals
and home cooking in the year of 1980,1990,2000 and 2010, and graph describes the average number of meals eaten in
fast-food cafe and sit-down restaurants per family.
Overall, At the beginning of the period middle-class family spent at least on restaurant meals. While, home cooking
was the most significant food-budget sector. In comparison, at the end of the period home cooking and restaurant meals
were equal in the ratio.
chart display eatery meals sector accounted for 10% of the average family of food budget in 1980, and experienced a
more than threefold increase to one-half in 2010. On the other hand, Home cooking were 90% in 1980 and these figure
decline to 50% in 2010.
Graph spectacle the mean number of meals eaten in fast-food eatery and sit-down restaurants per family. In 1980 both
have equal number approximately 20. After ten years, sit-down restaurant meals were slightly ahead than fast-food meals. In 2000 both were rise to near to 40 and 55 numbers, and fast-food meals exceed to sit-down meals, and in 2010 both are enhance around 90 and 50 numbers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the year of 1980,1990,2000 and 2010, and graph describes the average number of me...
^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bes the average number of meals eaten in fast-food cafe and sit-down restaurants ...
^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ily spent at least on restaurant meals. While, home cooking was the most significan...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on restaurant meals. While, home cooking was the most significant food-budget sec...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Chart
...ant meals were equal in the ratio. chart display eatery meals sector accounted f...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f food budget in 1980, and experienced a more than threefold increase to one-half...
^^^
Line 10, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ooking were 90% in 1980 and these figure decline to 50% in 2010. Graph spectac...
^^^
Line 13, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...own restaurants per family. In 1980 both have equal number approximately 20. Afte...
^^^
Line 14, column 140, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...than fast-food meals. In 2000 both were rise to near to 40 and 55 numbers, and fast-...
^^^^
Line 14, column 242, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enhanced'.
Suggestion: enhanced
...to sit-down meals, and in 2010 both are enhance around 90 and 50 numbers.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13065326633 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64668171832 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507537688442 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.4126134625 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508349690888 0.215688989381 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207794816864 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191493374491 0.0843802449381 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210347095588 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170271102211 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.